|
|

|
|
South Africa’s environment
deteriorating, warns report
15 July, 2007:
The condition of the environment in
South Africa in general is
deteriorating, a report has warned.
The second ‘State of the Environment’
report, or the South African
Environment Outlook, published
recently contains a clear warning that
the country is not doing well
vis-à-vis its vital natural resources.
The report cautions that “unless we
take urgent and dedicated measures,”
the physical environment of the
sub-continent and, significantly, the
socio-economic well-being of many
South Africans will continue to
deteriorate.
The State of the Environment report
also re-emphasises the very direct
connections between the health of the
natural environment and properly
functioning ecosystems on the one
hand, and sustainable development,
poverty alleviation and human health
and well-being, on the other. “These
connections have been, unfortunately,
too often ignored in the quest to
promote economic growth.”
The report contains a particular
warning for the Western Cape region,
which is predicted to bear the brunt
of global climate change and
associated warming and drying during
the coming decades. It notes that
reduced rainfall in the western parts
of South Africa because of climate
change could result in a 10% reduction
in run-off by 2015.
The main aim of the State of the
Environment report, which is only the
second of its kind after the first was
published in 1999, is “to provide
scientifically credible information
and assessments that will help drive
the future environmental agenda for
South Africa.”
It acknowledges progress in a number
of areas since 1999, including
“significant” progress in the area of
environmental management.
This progress includes laws and
strategies developed, focusing on key
areas like biodiversity, air quality,
protected areas, urban and rural
development, waste and disaster
management; stepped-up efforts to
implement and enforce the policy
framework; improved environmental
conditions (like recovering of some
fish stocks due to good management
measures); and slowing of habitat
loss.
Despite such gains, the report warns,
recent detailed assessments show that
South Africa is using up its natural
capital.
The “ecological footprint” per person
in South Africa is higher than the
global average (2.8 hectares per
person in South Africa compared to a
global average of 2.3 hectares per
person), and increased by 2% between
1991 and 2001. In other middle-income
and low-income countries, the average
ecological footprint declined during
this period.
The report notes that the majority of
poorer South Africans are still
directly dependent on natural
resources to survive. This means that
South Africa can ill-afford to let the
environment deteriorate.
There are increasing pressures on
South Africa’s natural systems, the
State of the Environment report says,
and “our ability to deal with them is
weak.”
|
|
|