|
|
|
You may have dictatorship in your genesThe AVPR1a gene is linked to ruthlessness in people.14 April, 2008: Yet another “behavioural disorder” has been blamed on the genes. According to researchers at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Israel, the ruthless behaviour of Hitler, Napoleon, Mussolini, Saddam Hussein, and Robert Mugabe may be attributed partly to their genes. The researchers claim that they have discovered that a gene called AVPR1a is linked with ruthlessness, and that it may explain “the money-grabbing tendencies of those with a Machiavellian streak.” The findings have been published in Genes, Brain and Behavior, a scientific journal published by the International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society in collaboration with Blackwell Publishing. Richard Ebstein, lead researcher, wrote in Genes, Brain and Behavior that they conducted an economic exercise called the ‘Dictator Game’ with over 200 student volunteers. The exercise, he continued, “allowed the participants to behave selflessly, or like money-grabbing dictators like former Zaire President Mobutu who filled in his pockets at the cost of its citizens. While the exact mechanism by which the gene influences behaviour was unknown, one could say that one some people just did not believe in the old adage that ‘it is better to give than to receive.” Ebstein suggested that the “reward centres” in their brains might derive less pleasure from altruistic acts, leading money-grabbers to behave more selfishly.
In the study, the researchers
exclusively focused on the called gene
called AVPR1 as it is known to produce
receptors in the brain that detect
vasopressin, a hormone involved in
altruism and “pro-social” behaviour.
The researchers said they “wondered if
differences in expression of this
receptor in the human brain might make
different people more or less likely
to behave generously.” ANI quoted Nicholas Bardsley at the University of Southampton, the United Kingdom, who studied the ‘Dictator Game,’ as saying that that “researchers should be careful while using such games as a tool for arriving at results regarding human generosity.”
|
|
|
|
|
|