<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DWS Politics &#187; UPA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics/tag/upa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:05:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>India&#8217;s river inter-linking plan dropped</title>
		<link>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics/indias-river-inter-linking-plan-dropped/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics/indias-river-inter-linking-plan-dropped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Politico</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[India drops plan for country-wide inter-linking of rivers fearing ecology damage. The Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government at the Centre, after having vacillated for the last 5 years, has finally abandoned the ambitious project planned by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government to inter-link the rivers in India. The ambitious scheme, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics/indias-river-inter-linking-plan-dropped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single largest alliance in 2009 Lok Sabha elections &#8211; UPA or NDA?</title>
		<link>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics/single-largest-alliance-in-2009-lok-sabha-elections-upa-or-nda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics/single-largest-alliance-in-2009-lok-sabha-elections-upa-or-nda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Politico</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indian States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Lok Sabha Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, tricky question. We have only four more hours to go for counting to begin, and what is the relevance of such a question at this point? Nothing much. The interesting thing is that exit polls by TV channels have predicted that the UPA would get higher number of seats in the Lok Sabha 2009 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/politics/single-largest-alliance-in-2009-lok-sabha-elections-upa-or-nda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

