<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: India rejects patents for Pfizer&#8217;s Caduet, GSK&#8217;s rosiglitazone salt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancewithshadows.com/pillscribe/india-rejects-patents-for-pfizers-caduet-gsks-rosiglitazone-salt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/pillscribe/india-rejects-patents-for-pfizers-caduet-gsks-rosiglitazone-salt/</link>
	<description>The best of pharma news and views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:17:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: India's revised Mashelkar committee report seeks to extend patents to incremental pharmaceutical inventions in Indian patent law &#124; DWS Pill Scribe</title>
		<link>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/pillscribe/india-rejects-patents-for-pfizers-caduet-gsks-rosiglitazone-salt/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>India's revised Mashelkar committee report seeks to extend patents to incremental pharmaceutical inventions in Indian patent law &#124; DWS Pill Scribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancewithshadows.com/pillscribe/?p=183#comment-63</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. Pfizer&#8217;s Applications Claiming Caduet (rejected pursuant to a PreGrant Opposition filed by Tor... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. Pfizer&#8217;s Applications Claiming Caduet (rejected pursuant to a PreGrant Opposition filed by Tor&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

