<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brideshead Revisited remake soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancewithshadows.com/movies/brideshead-revisited-remake-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/movies/brideshead-revisited-remake-soon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:40:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.dancewithshadows.com/movies/brideshead-revisited-remake-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancewithshadows.com/movies/?p=55#comment-46</guid>
		<description>My first thought is how do they dare make a remake of the original Brideshead!  After looking at the &quot;trailer&quot; for this remake, I&#039;m thinking it might just be good for what it is and I should not make comparisons, but keep the original Brideshead on its pedestal.  Just look at the still picture above of Jeremy Irons and Anthony Andrews - that says it all!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought is how do they dare make a remake of the original Brideshead!  After looking at the &#8220;trailer&#8221; for this remake, I&#8217;m thinking it might just be good for what it is and I should not make comparisons, but keep the original Brideshead on its pedestal.  Just look at the still picture above of Jeremy Irons and Anthony Andrews &#8211; that says it all!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

