|
|

|
|
| |
|
CHINESE MEDIA RESTRICTIONS |
China allows media to report on
national emergencies
We have a feeling events like
Tiananmen won't be included in a list
of emergencies, though.
BY A CORRESPONDENT
26 June, 2007:
China has withdrawn a law that
could have made it tougher for
journalists to report on riots,
disasters and other emergencies.
China’s state-controlled China Daily
reported that the Standing Committee
of the National People’s Congress
revised the law after delegates and
local people’s congresses criticised
the legislation, terming it as
improper.
According to the second draft
emergency response law, tabled at the
Standing Committee’s 28th session,
governments in charge of coping with
an emergency should provide unified,
accurate and timely information on the
emergency and its development.
The proposal, first introduced in June
2006, would have imposed fines up to
$13,000 on media outlets that report
on public emergencies such as floods
or outbreak of diseases without formal
authorisation or using fabricated
information.
Finally, legislators decided to
eliminate the mention of fines from
the draft law.
In his report, Wang Maolin,
vice-director of the National People’s
Congress Law Committee, was quoted by
the China Daily as saying that some
lawmakers have called for the
government to provide unified,
accurate and timely information on
emergencies, and that the news media
should report these emergencies
“objectively.”
The new draft, which addresses
concerns that local governments may
use the law to suppress negative
disaster coverage to avoid
embarrassment, removes the requirement
for government authorisation and only
targets media outlets that fabricate
news or use fabricated information.
Those media outlets deemed to have
violated the law will be subjected to
“warnings, punishment, or prosecution”
if the false reporting caused “serious
consequences.” The law defines “public
emergencies” to include industrial
accidents, natural disasters as well
as public health and security crises.
There has been international criticism
that China has attempted to cover up
the extent of natural disasters or
outbreak of diseases. In 2003, China
was widely criticised for its handling
of the severe acute respiratory
syndrome (SARS) epidemic.
After it emerged in southern China,
SARS eventually spread globally,
infecting over 8,000 people and
killing more than 800 people,
including 349 in China.
Local authorities reportedly
downplayed statistics and restricted
media coverage of SARS, leading to
delays in efforts to treat or
quarantine the disease.
This triggered concerns among some
lawmakers that local governments could
use the law to cover up disasters that
might reflect badly on them, such as
mining fatalities caused by poor
safety measures.
|
|
|
|
|
|