|
|
Air Deccan cheating passengers,
says CNN - IBN. Airlines denies
charges
CNN-IBN sting 'exposes' Air
Deccan's practices; airline denies
vehemently.
BY A CORRESPONDENT

March 23, 2007: It seems Air Deccan,
India’s leading budget airline, is in
the habit of deliberately offloading
passengers at airports. According to
CNN-IBN, which conducted a sting
operation of sorts at the Bangalore
airport with its special team going
undercover as passengers in February
2007, offloading of passengers is
almost routine for Air Deccan.
However, the airline's top officials
have strenuously denied the charges.
If you visit the Air Deccan website,
you will see a full screen notice
denying all the allegations of CNN IBN
and accusing it of not checking the
facts properly.
IBN has not so far gone back on its
claims against Air Deccan; and Air
deccan, despite its denials, has not
so far taken the legal route against
it.
The DWS view: We wish both the channel
an the airline continue to stand by
their statements. If the scam is true,
the channel has done a great job. On
the other hand, often, the media does
not do its homework and comes out with
half-baked allegations. This has to
end, and only a court can decide the
facts of the matter in this case - and
put one of the two parties in their
place.
The CNN-IBN team came across a number
of passengers who were left high and
dry at the Bangalore airport.
Complained one passenger: “I reached
here at 5:20 a.m. but someone from Air
Deccan came and wrote 5:30 at the
counter and said I cannot board the
flight as I was three minutes late.”
Another offloaded passenger had to say
this: “At first the Air Deccan people
had written 5:15 a.m. or 5:20 a.m.
Then they took the ticket and
manipulated it, making the time 5:30
a.m. 5:35 a.m. You can see it on my
ticket distinctly.”
“You are one minute late and you lose
Rs 7,000,” lamented an angry,
frustrated passenger.
The CNN-IBN team found some passengers
pleading with the Air Deccan officials
to let them board the flight which
they think they had every right to do.
One was almost begging, presenting his
case: “I am going home after two years
and just for 12 hours at that. Please
let me on that flight.” How does all
this happen? According CNN-IBN, the
entire operation is engineered.
When a passenger checks in, the
processes are deliberately slowed down
– first the baggage screening process,
then at the check-in counter. The
check-in staff at the counter, CNN-IBN
reveals, is purposely told to slow
down. The result: Passengers are
declared as having come late even when
they arrive early.
An official of the Airports Authority
of India (AAI) at Bangalore, who
preferred not to be named, said: “Air
Deccan slows down the counter work and
the sales department sells more
tickets. Which means, India’ leading
budget airline obviously overbook.” He
added: “Low-cost airlines cannot
overbook because they do not refund
fares or transfer passengers to other
airlines.
Air Deccan, on its part, blames all
this on systems fault. Captain G R
Gopinath, MD of Air Deccan says:
“There were some overbookings. Our
website was hacked by some unknown
elements, and even flights that did
not exist showed on the computer. The
passengers who have suffered will be
getting compensation.”
However, airport officials refute the
airline’s version, stressing that a
scam does exist and that it is an open
secret. According to the Bangalore
airport manager, “this has been
happening to too many passengers.”
The Directorate-General of Civil
Aviation (DGCA), the aviation
watchdog, is looking the other way,
according to CNN-IBN.
The CNN-IBN team claims to have
unravelled more. One a single day,
while the airline offloaded 15
passengers and declared them
late-comers, it showed the same 15
passengers as ‘No- Shows’ – thus
pocketing the ticket amount of the
extra tickets and refunding only the
tax amount. And, this is a gross
violation of the DGCA norms.
Now all we have to do is to wait
and see where this controversy goes.
If it all dies down without a clear
victor, it is a blow for responsible
journalism as well as good corporate
practices. Let us wait and see.
|