|
|

|
|
| |
|
UMBILICAL CORD CUTTING IN
BABIES |
Delay in cutting umbilical cord
good for babies
19 August, 2007:
A delay in cutting the umbilical cord
could improve a newborn’s health. A
newborn’s umbilical cord is usually
clamped and cut within a minute of
birth to counter the risk of jaundice.
But waiting until three minutes would
increase the child’s iron levels and
reduce the risk of anemia, says Dr
Andrew Weeks, a senior lecturer in
obstetrics at University of
Liverpool’s School of Reproductive and
Developmental Medicine, the United
Kingdom.
A research conducted in the United
States earlier had found that such a
delay was most beneficial to premature
babies and had no impact on rates of
jaundice.
Dr Weeks’ study – which is an overview
of trials involving 1,900 newborns –
showed that delayed clamping of the
umbilical cord only failed to benefit
babies whose growth had been
restricted.
The rate of early cord-cutting varies
around Europe. In Denmark, the figure
is only 17%, compared with 75% in
Britain, and 90% in France.
Dr Weeks told the British Medical
Journal that a delay in cutting the
cord helped more oxygen-rich blood
reach the baby’s lungs. This increases
iron
levels until the newborn’s own
breathing can become fully
established.
The umbilical cord is important for
the baby at birth since it sends
oxygen-rich blood to the lungs until
the infant’s breathing establishes.
Therefore, as long as the cord is
unclamped, the average transfusion to
the newborn is equivalent to 21% of
the neonate’s final blood volume and
three quarters of the transfusion
occurs in the first minute after
birth.
For babies born at term, large
autotransfusion can increase their
iron status. This may be lifesaving in
areas where anemia is endemic.
Though in developed countries, there
is the worry that delayed clamping and
cutting of the cord increase the risk
of polycythaemia and perbilirubinaemia
(abnormally high levels of red blood
cells and bile pigments in the
bloodstream, often leading to
jaundice), trials have show this is
not the case.
Dr Weeks explains: “In normal
deliveries, delaying cord-clamping for
three minutes with the baby on the
mother's abdomen should not be
difficult. The
situation is a little more complex for
babies born by caesarean section, or
for those who need support soon after
birth. Nevertheless, it is these
babies
who may benefit most from a delay in
cord-clamping.”
There is now considerable evidence
that early cord-clamping does not
benefit mothers or babies and may even
be harmful, he said.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) no
longer advocates early cord-cutting.
According to the Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,
there are no guidelines in this regard
in the United Kingdom.
Dr Andrew Weeks’ comments in the
British Medical Journal came after a
study published earlier in 2007 in the
Journal of the American Medical
Association which claimed that a delay
of at least two minutes in cutting the
cord could help the baby by boosting
iron levels.
Another study conducted in the United
States has shown that delaying
clamping reduced hemorrhaging in the
brain of premature babies by 62%.
|
|
|
|
|
|